Clinical Outcomes, Complications, and Cost-effectiveness in Surgically Treated Adult Spinal Deformity Over 70 Years: A Propensity score-Matched Analysis.

STUDY DESIGN: This is a multicentered retrospective study. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Surgical correction for the adult spinal deformity (ASD) is effective but carries substantial risks for complications. The diverse pathologies of ASD make it difficult to determine the effect of advanced age on outcomes. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess how advanced age affects outcomes and cost-effectiveness for corrective surgery for ASD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used data from a multicenter database to conduct propensity score-matched comparisons of 50 patients who were surgically treated for ASD when at least 50 years old and were followed for at least 2 years, to clarify whether advanced age is a risk factor for inferior health-related quality of life and cost-effectiveness. Patients were grouped by age, 50-65 years (M group: 59±4 y) or >70 years (O group: 74±3 y), and were propensity score-matched for sex, body mass index, upper and lower instrumented vertebrae, the use of pedicle-subtraction osteotomy, and sagittal alignment. Cost-effectiveness was determined by cost/quality-adjusted life years. RESULTS: Oswestry Disability Index and Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) pain and self-image at the 2-year follow-up were significantly inferior in the O group (Oswestry Disability Index: 32±9% vs. 25±13%, P=0.01; SRS-22 pain: 3.5±0.7 vs. 3.9±0.6, P=0.05; SRS-22 self-image: 3.5±0.6 vs. 3.8±0.9, P=0.03). The O group had more complications than the M group (55% vs. 29%). The odds ratios in the O group were 4.0 for postoperative complications (95% confidence interval: 1.1-12.3) and 4.9 for implant-related complications (95% confidence interval: 1.2-21.1). Cost-utility analysis at 2 years after surgery indicated that the surgery was less cost-effective in the O group (cost/quality-adjusted life year: O group: $211,636 vs. M group: 125,887, P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes for corrective surgery for ASD were inferior in geriatric patients compared with middle-aged patients, in whom the extent of spinal deformity and the operation type were adjusted similarly. Special attention is needed when considering surgical treatment for geriatric ASD patients.

Role of Ethnicity in Alignment Compensation: Propensity Matched Analysis of Differential Compensatory Mechanism Recruitment Patterns for Sagittal Malalignment in 288 ASD Patients From Japan, Korea, and United States.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of adult spinal deformity patients in a multiethnic database. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the role of ethnicity on recruitment of compensatory mechanisms for sagittal spinal deformity. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: While the impacts of age, sex, and pelvic morphology on the ability to compensate for sagittal malalignment have been investigated, the role of ethnicity in compensatory mechanism recruitment is poorly understood. METHODS: Patients from USA (85% Caucasian) >25 y/o were propensity matched by age, sex, and pelvic incidence with patients from Korea and Japan. Only primary patients or those with existing fusion below T12 were retained for analysis. Groups were subclassified by deformity severity (aligned: sagittal vertical axis (SVA) <50 mm; moderate malalignment: SVA 50-100 mm; severe malalignment: SVA >100 mm). Radiographic measurements including pelvic retroversion, thoracic kyphosis, loss of lumbar lordosis (PI minus LL), cervical lordosis, and cervical SVA were compared between the groups. RESULTS: There were 288 patients (96 each in USA, KOR, JPN), with similar age (64-67 yr) and PI (49-53°). USA had smaller pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis in every alignment group (P <0.05). In moderate malalignment, JPN had more pelvic retroversion than USA (30° vs. 20°), and KOR had more thoracic hypokyphosis than USA (15 vs. 31°). In severe malalignment, JPN had more pelvic retroversion than USA (39° vs. 27°), and KOR had more thoracic hypokyphosis than USA (15° vs. 31°). KOR had smaller cSVA than USA in both aligned (11 vs. 27 mm) and moderate (19 vs. 31 mm) malalignment. In severe malalignment, KOR had less cervical lordosis (13° KOR vs. 15° USA vs. 27° JPN). All differences with P <0.05. CONCLUSION: Compensation for sagittal is ethnicity dependent. Korean patients favor thoracic compensation via hypokyphosis, and Japanese patients favor pelvic compensation via retroversion. Patient ethnicity should be considered when evaluating the sagittal plane and surgical correction strategies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.